Bike vs. Car
- According to the federal government, biking for transportation can count toward the minimum 150 minutes/week of moderate-intensity aerobic activity recommended for physical health. It is also listed as the safest way to get physical activity. –U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2008
- Active commuting that incorporates cycling and walking is associated with an overall 11% reduction in cardiovascular risk. –Hamer, M., and Y. Chida, 2007
- An adult cyclist typically has a level of fitness equivalent to someone 10 years younger and a life expectancy two years above the average. –Paffenbarger, R., et al., 1986., and Department for Transport, 2007
- One study found that cycling improves levels of well-being, self-confidence, and tolerance to stress while reducing tiredness, difficulties with sleep and a range of medical symptoms. –Boyd, H., et al., 1998
- The health benefits of cycling outweigh the safety risks by a factor of 20 to one. –Hillman, M., 1992
- By 2017, Portland, Oregon residents will have saved $64 million in health care costs thanks to bicycling. By 2040, the city will have invested $138-605 million in bicycling yet saved $388-594 million in health care costs and $143-218 million in fuel costs, a benefit-cost ratio of up to 4 to 1. –Gotschi, T., 2011
These were just a few of the statistics that I found. After writing this paper I definitely felt like I didn’t have much to support my desire to keep the car. I do drive a Prius C so my emissions are significantly less than average (though the footprint is still debatable with the mining involved to make the battery). I had a lot of thinking to do after writing this paper. Why was it that I “needed” my car? Well, I had to write a second paper for this class and this was about the advocacy surrounding my topic. I found that bike advocacy is the primary way that change happens in the biking community. I found that the most bike accessible cities ie Portland, Minneapolis, etc had invested millions of dollars in their public transport and biking infrastructure. It wasn’t something that just happened. There was a lot of intention and hard work put towards building the cities so that biking was safe and often easier than driving. Santa Fe unfortunately does not have the same level of advocacy/funding as those cities. A recent bill to give cyclists 5 feet on the road was denied, which I think is absurd. We do have people working towards creating bike paths but the majority of drivers here still view people on bikes as a nuisance and it often feels as if they are trying to run you over. So right now cycling with an infant in the snow without adequate bike lanes/paths just doesn’t sound very enticing, especially while juggling being a full time grad school student. It has nothing to do with me not understanding the benefits of cycling. I just don’t feel that it’s all that practical right now in my life in the Santa Fe. Would I consider living car free, yes…just not right this moment. For now I’d like to have the option of choosing, even if the choice to drive is minimal.
Leave a Reply